Article
Index
Calendar
CD's
- Cost
Justification CD
- LIMS Primer
CD
Email Newsletter
Featured Article
Guest Book
Industry
News
Introduction to LIMS
LIMS Products
& Services
LIMSource
Reprints
Last
updated: November 10, 2007
Contact
The LIMSource® and
LIMS/Letter® are registered
trademarks of the LIMSource,
P.O. Box 935
Kenwood, CA 95452 USA
Tel: +1 (707) 526-6885
Fax: +1 (707) 526-6889
© 1994-2007
Copyright©LIMS/Letter.
All Rights Reserved.
Legal Notice.
|
|
21st
Century Process Management Using SPC-Based Manufacturing Analytics
by
Phil Schreiber, VP Sales & Marketing, Northwest Analytical, Inc
Actively
using SPC and Manufacturing Analytics lets you use large volumes of process
data effectively to manage the enterprise
We constantly hear that we are in a new era where the problem
is no longer one of not being able to collect enough data on our manufacturing
processes, but how to effectively use the massive volume of data we collect.
One of the primary battle cries of this new era is, “Better analysis
of the data is absolutely essential!” (Then, following that battle
cry is usually a summary of someone’s particular flavor of analysis
technology or methodology.) Chances are, the term “KPI” is
also mentioned, as it is explained how this technology contributes to
the KPI process.
In keeping with that established path, let us examine an established technology
in a new light.
Traditional Quality and Specification Analysis SPC
Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a time honored and well demonstrated
method of process management. Everyone who has studied modern manufacturing
knows of Dr. Deming and his early work establishing SPC as a standard
practice in postwar Japan. SPC has long been used for measuring and monitoring
quality by the Quality departments and labs of most industrial manufacturing
facilities.
SPC has undergone periodic recasting and updates, such as Continuous Process
Improvement (CPI) and Total Quality Management (TQM), as we learn more
in each cycle of popularity. Certainly SPC is a key part of the Six Sigma
and Lean Six Sigma processes that many manufacturing companies have invested
in.
Many of these SPC applications provide data analysis either “after
the fact”, in the case of quality monitoring in a lab based on product
samples at the end of a production process, or somewhat removed from the
immediate “actionable decisions”, in the case of the Six Sigma
processes.
Typical applications of the traditional SPC methods include successful
quality/process management functions such as:
- Routine SQC/SPC Reporting
- Process Monitoring and Improvement
- Analytical Method QC in Laboratories
- Regulatory Compliance
- Supply Chain Customer Certification
Emerging Real-Time Operational Decision Support SPC Analysis
While the SPC analytical methods have met the challenge in these functions,
it also is the right tool to meet the emerging battle cry for better analysis
of available data. The time based, comparative analysis and visual presentation
of the analysis that are unique to the SPC methods, enable manufacturers
to better understand their processes and, more importantly to take immediate
action based upon the analysis of the data. SPC is the appropriate technology
and methodology to meet the current needs of manufacturing that call for
data analysis to provide:
- Ability to measure ROI on systems investment
- Timely and effective analysis summaries and reporting
- Predictive capability
- Identifiable benefits (lower costs, higher yields)
- Support immediate actionable decision processes based upon results
- High confidence to make process change for improvement
- Incorporation into a proactive process improvement program
- Make it easy to get specific, role-based results for individual informational
needs
- Reduce complex calculations of aggregated data to meaningful and measurable
information with context
- Immediately measurable results of actions taken
If the battle cry is for better analysis, then Real-Time, actionable,
decision support analysis are the rally points. Again, the SPC techniques,
methods and characteristics lend themselves to these points. The ability
to provide the manufacturing operator with real-time SPC derived analysis,
presented visually in a simple enough format to quickly identify “out
of control” parameters, is the goal. This real-time presentation
can take the form of a robust SPC application embedded within an HMI display
or it could be in the form of a dedicated SPC data collection and analysis
system on the manufacturing floor.
In the HMI applications, SPC has often been viewed as an accessory function.
However, the emerging requirement for better analysis, to facilitate better
process management and improvement, requires that fully developed SPC
analysis and presentation tools be an embedded function within the HMI.
This facilitates the most effective real-time data capture and analysis,
provides the operator with immediate access to the visual presentation
of the analysis, allows a mechanism for the operator to document preventative
or corrective actions taken, and supports the emerging role of the HMI
as a feed into integrated enterprise analytics.
SPC is fundamental in this emerging need of better data analysis. It is
how to make more effective use of all the data in historians, MES and
ERP systems. It also allow for the reduction of complex, specialized process
data into graphic visualizations which operations and management can quickly
understand and from which informed action can be taken.
Some of the particular derived benefits of Real-Time Decision Support
SPC Analytics are:
- Robust, easy to understand, high level of confidence
- Identify, verify and reduce sources of variation
- Analyzes ongoing and immediate variation, not final product quality
– process control not product control
- Applies to both the process and the product
- Detects changes, shifts and unusual events
- Separates signals from noise
- Identifies causes of excessive variation
- Monitors real-time results of continuous process improvement activities
(pitch for CPI as one of the real ROI payoffs for SPC)
- Predictive problem detection on a stable process
- Provides tool for documentation of compliance with customer supply chain
requirements
SPC Based Manufacturing Analytics
Along with the battle cry for better analysis of data, there has been
an increase in the use of Business Intelligence and Business Analysis
tools, and the desire to integrate production data and analysis with business
data and analysis. This is all aimed at developing a better understanding
of complete corporate performance.
This new opportunity has created the need for analytical tools that can
perform in this joint environment, and deliver to these goals. SPC methods
arise well to this new opportunity in the form of SPC based Manufacturing
Analytics.
SPC based Manufacturing Analytics is statistical and rule based, providing
the aggregation, analysis and role-based visualization and reporting of
manufacturing data that enables users to better understand and improve
their processes, identify and reinforce best practices, react quickly
to process events, and anticipate potential problems before they affect
product quality, yield, or cost. The key differentiating elements of the
SPC based Manufacturing Analytics methodology for analyzing data are:
- Statistically based
- Focused on role based analysis and reporting
- Identifies significant events, separating out “noise”
- Emphasis on visual presentation technique to enable quick analysis
- Supports both reactive and predictive behavior
- Easy enough to be implemented, maintained, and used by existing plant
personnel
- Aggregates data from different sources while preserving statistical
validity
- Supports the ISA S-95 Production Performance Analysis Activity Model,
which outlines the need for robust systems, methodologies, and tools to
improve the ability to make very informed decisions based upon extensive
and varied analysis functions.
What has been the result of the merging of these two levels of business
analysis and manufacturing analysis are value parameters used to monitor
the overall status and performance of an operation or enterprise. These
are expressed as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), which are usually
a single parameter consisting of an aggregation of financial, operational,
and measured parameters to provide a meaningful and reliable KPI variable.
These variables are often monitored for a “good” or “bad”
status in some sort of web-based visualization tool, such as a portal
or dashboard. The ability to contribute to or provision this web-based
visualization function is a key component of the new analysis opportunity.
SPC based Manufacturing Analytics methodologies would allow for a system
to be created that monitors the stability and change of all the parameter
components contributing to the KPI, which would allow the detection of
a change in one key KPI component before the KPI itself shows to be out
of range. The visual presentation of this detection could then be displayed
not as just a “good” (green) or “bad” (red) status,
but even as a “potentially getting worse” (yellow) status.
Existing KPI analysis and reporting systems do not have access to all
the parameters or the ability to represent all the components in this
fashion, such that operations and management can quickly identify, or
even predict, early signs of detrimental change to take action against.
Choosing an SPC Analysis Platform
A good SPC platform should be able to accommodate all three levels of
analytics outlined here for the manufacturing environment.
- Traditional – SPC Quality and Specification Analysis
- Emerging – Real-Time Operational Decision Support SPC Analysis
- New – SPC Driven Manufacturing Analytics
Additionally, this platform must be architecturally structured to allow
for growth and expansion around the different levels of need and phased
implementation a manufacturer may require. This requires a modular and
component based approach that allows easy integration into existing and
disparate systems, with an open and standards based approach to accessing
the data to be analyzed. A system that can provide this function of real-time
SPC analytics, coupled with role specific, visual reporting, can support
the full range of analytics and decision support for all levels from plant
floor through management.
Case Studies
The following examples illustrate how SPC-based Manufacturing Analytics
is being implemented to get real benefits and improve the operating process.
Flexible Packaging – Offline and online real-time SPC analysis
supports continuous improvement program
A large international flexible packaging manufacturer produces many different
products of a similar form for various food industry customers. Product
specifications are slightly different for each customer, and tight monitoring
of the production against these specifications is necessary to meet supply
chain requirements. Once the production line is running, the goal is keep
the line running, and only make necessary changes to the equipment to
ensure that the product remains within specs.

By using SPC analysis of electronically collected measurement samples
on a real-time basis, and then presenting the results to the operator
in a very basic “in or out” of specification/control visual
display, the operators were able to detect and make appropriate adjustments
to keep the production line running and achieve reduced variation and
reduction in returned product.
The operators and quality inspectors have information directly available
to them from this interface. They are able to view summary historic data,
as well as real-time SPC charts to analyze the process. These role specific
reports give the staff complete access to standard operating procedures
and support uniform workflows.
SPC is used to establish process control limits and support quality control
initiatives. Engineering uses the software for process studies and to
work process capability into specifications. The approach is part of the
continuous process improvement programs which reduce variation, decrease
scrap, and reduce product overages.
As a result of proactively using SPC, the plant has been able to improve
operations by limiting weight variation during the manufacturing process.
Over the past two years, the difference between the target weights versus
actual weight was measured and benchmarked. The measured results showed
a cumulative cost savings of over $200,000 since the program started.
Food Safety – Use SPC Analytics for early prediction
A poultry processing plant monitors regulated bacteria such as E. coli
and Salmonella. When the pathogen level exceeds the limit, the required
action is costly and time consuming. Exceeding the safe levels can happen
quickly, with little time for corrective action. Setting arbitrary “reaction”
limits can lead to a tradeoff between false positives and missing signals.
The fact that they actively use SPC and actively manage the process enables
fast and informed response. Applying Manufacturing Analytics using SPC-based
event and pattern rule violation detection results in early detection
of an unstable process, predicting the likelihood of an event, and enabling
corrective action and process improvement to prevent reoccurrence.
By using continuous process improvement, the poultry plant was able to
develop very high capability production (Cpk = 12.2) with regard to pathogen
levels. This provides a large amount of manufacturing head room. Because
of this high capability process management, the plant has a substantial
leeway when a process destabilizing event occurs, and can continue to
produce wholesome food while the process engineers are returning the process
to control.
Food Packaging – Using SPC Analytics to manage a co-packer’s
performance
A dairy processing facility uses SPC Analytics to monitor the fill weights
of their products. They use SPC control charts to monitor a KPI that indicates
whether the fill weights fall within a Maximum Allowable Variation (MAV)
ratio. This enables them to maximize the product yield while controlling
the risk of MAV violation.
The dairy uses a co-packer to package some specialty products. The dairy
qualifies the co-packer by using SPC to evaluate their process dependability
and capability to meet specifications. Production fill weights are routinely
collected and SPC results reported to the dairy as part of their supply
chain quality management.
Since both the vendor and customer are using the same analytics and charts,
they can more effectively collaborate to improve the process and yields.
In addition, the dairy can use the co-packer’s quality deliverables
to manage their label weight regulatory compliance.
OEE - Use of SPC to validate OEE calculations
SPC and process capability methods increase value and usability of OEE
values. The OEE KPI can be treated like any other process parameter with
trend and capability monitoring and analysis. Using SPC methods to analyze
and chart the OEE values provides far more actionable information than
a simple annunciator on the management dashboard. Not only does the SPC
chart and trend analysis deliver more and better decision support on the
OEE KPI, you can drill down and study the behavior of the individual OEE
components, availability, performance and yield.
KPI Component Analysis
A plant uses large, continuous process ovens needs to develop a meaningful
and reliable KPI consisting of financial, operational, and measured parameters
to accurately represent the total energy costs. The existing KPI system
was unable to monitor all the necessary component variables and visually
display the KPI, such that operations could react to early signs of change.
By applying MA using SPC-driven, role-based visualization reporting techniques,
the plant could create a system that monitored the stability and change
of all the parameter components contributing to the Energy Consumption
KPI, which allowed the detection of a change in one key KPI component
before the KPI itself showed to be out of range.
Conclusion
Modern control systems, plant floor data collection, and laboratories
generate large volumes of process data. Unless this data is analyzed and
usefully reported to all the staff involved in production and plant management,
it will not be useful for operational management decision making. Actively
using SPC and Manufacturing Analytics enables this data to be effectively
used to manage the enterprise. Tightly coupled analytics will make control
systems a core component of 21st century process and enterprise management
systems.
About
the Author
Phil Schreiber is VP of Sales & Marketing for Northwest Analytical,
Inc. For more information about SPC based manufacturing analytics, visit
Northwest Analytical at http://www.NWAsoft.com.
|
|